Storm Chaos at Delhi Airport: Three Air India Planes Hit by Ground Equipment

Three narrowbody aircraft operated by Air India (AI) sustained structural damage at Indira Gandhi International Airport (DEL), New Delhi, on Saturday, June 7, 2026, after a sudden and intense storm dislodged ground support equipment (GSE) parked near Terminal 2, sending it crashing into the jets. Delhi International Airport Limited (DIAL), the private airport operator, confirmed the incident and disclosed that all three aircraft were subsequently withdrawn from service for inspection and repair. No passengers or crew were aboard the affected aircraft at the time, and no injuries were reported.

The storm struck at approximately 4:40 p.m. local time, with strong winds and heavy rainfall creating conditions that precipitously displaced GSE from adjacent stands. According to AeroTime, the equipment involved included a step ladder and trestles. Crucially, DIAL stated that Air Traffic Control (ATC) issued no advance weather warning to either the airport operator or the airlines — a disclosure that has drawn immediate scrutiny from aviation observers.

Photo: Anna Zvereva | Wikimedia Commons

What Happened at Delhi Airport’s Terminal 2

The three aircraft were parked at Terminal 2 of Indira Gandhi International Airport (DEL) when the storm descended with little notice. DIAL confirmed that weather conditions deteriorated rapidly, with strong winds and intense rainfall combining to displace ground equipment from its positions.

A video circulating on X (formerly Twitter) captured the ferocity of the storm, showing near-zero visibility and horizontal rain sweeping across the apron. The footage underscored how quickly, and catastrophically, the meteorological situation on the ground changed.

AeroTime reported that the three aircraft involved were Airbus A320-family jets. All three were removed from service immediately after the collision, pending damage assessments.

Airbus A320-Family: The Aircraft at the Centre of the Incident

The aircraft affected by the June 7 incident belong to Air India’s Airbus A320 narrowbody family, the workhorse of the carrier’s domestic and short-haul network. As of late 2025, Air India operated over 104 A320-family aircraft featuring new or upgraded cabin interiors, following the completion of the first phase of the airline’s $400 million retrofit programme.

Aircraft Type In Service Parked Total Active Fleet Avg. Age
Airbus A319 4 0 4 17.3 Years
Airbus A320 91 7 98 6.2 Years
Airbus A321 17 6 23 11.5 Years
Airbus A350 XWB 6 0 6 2.7 Years
Boeing 777 14 5 19 15.6 Years
Boeing 787 Dreamliner 27 7 34 10.1 Years
Total 159 25 184 8.7 Years

Data: planespotters.net

Key specifications and cabin features of Air India’s A320-family fleet include:

  • Three-class cabin configuration: Business, Premium Economy, and Economy Class
  • Next-generation seating: Over 15,000 new seats installed across the retrofitted narrowbody fleet
  • In-seat connectivity: USB-A and USB-C charging ports at every seat
  • In-flight entertainment: Access to Vista Stream, Air India’s streaming service offering approximately 900 hours of global content on personal devices
  • Net Promoter Score (NPS): Consistently between 45 and 50 points monthly for narrowbody operations, according to Air India’s press release
Photo: Md Shaifuzzaman Ayon | Wikimedia Commons

Ground Equipment, Ownership Disputes, And the ATC Warning Gap

DIAL attributed the displaced equipment to Air India Engineering Services and IndiGo’s (6E) ground handling operations. IndiGo, however, reportedly disputed that its equipment struck any of the aircraft, adding a layer of contention to the incident’s post-event narrative.

National Herald India reported that airport authorities have initiated a formal investigation to determine the sequence of events and assess whether additional safety protocols are warranted for extreme weather scenarios. The central question for investigators will be whether adequate GSE securing procedures were in place and enforced before the storm.

An unnamed airline source told PTI that aircraft belonging to operators other than Air India were also affected by the hostile weather, suggesting the damage may have been broader than initial reports indicated. Air India itself declined to issue an official comment on the incident.

Photo: Wikimedia Commons | Quintin Soloviev

Two Aircraft May Return Quickly, One Faces Longer Grounding

The three affected A320-family jets face disparate repair timelines. Sources cited by National Herald India indicated that two of the three aircraft are expected to return to service relatively quickly, after inspections confirm the extent of the damage and minor repairs are completed. The third aircraft, however, may require a more protracted grounding, depending on the severity of structural damage assessed during maintenance.

The nature of GSE impact damage varies considerably based on the point of contact. Equipment striking an aircraft’s fuselage, wing leading edge, or control surface can necessitate extensive non-destructive testing (NDT) before the aircraft is cleared for return to service. The regulatory framework governing such returns requires sign-off from India’s Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA).

Air India has not publicly disclosed the specific registrations of the three aircraft or the routes affected by their grounding. The carrier’s silence is consistent with its response to the incident as a whole, having declined all press comment.

Photo: Wikimedia Commons | Sunil Nath

How This Fits Air India’s Recent Safety Record

The June 7 storm damage does not exist in isolation. It is the latest in a sequence of significant ground-handling and surface-safety incidents involving Air India aircraft at DEL that has placed the carrier and the airport under intensifying scrutiny.

On January 15, 2026, an Air India Airbus A350-900 (registered VT-JRB), operating flight AI-101 from DEL to New York John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK), was forced to divert back to Delhi following the temporary closure of Iranian airspace.

According to Reuters, upon landing and during taxiing to the apron in dense fog, the aircraft’s right-hand Rolls-Royce Trent XWB engine ingested a stray cargo container that had fallen from a ground-handling tug operated by Bird Worldwide Flight Services (BWFS). FlightGlobal reported that the container caused “substantial damage” to the powerplant.

Taken together with the June 7 storm incident, these events reflect a pattern of ground-safety vulnerabilities at DEL that extend beyond any single operator. A 2026 DGCA audit had previously flagged significant safety lapses at major Indian airports, including faded runway markings, faulty simulator training, and inadequate maintenance practices.

Photo: S5A-0043 | Wikimedia Commons

Air India’s Broader Safety Context: The Shadow of Flight AI171

The ground incidents at DEL must also be read against the backdrop of Air India’s most consequential safety event in recent history. On June 12, 2025, Air India Flight AI171 — a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner registered VT-ANB — crashed shortly after takeoff from Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport (AMD), Ahmedabad, killing 241 of the 242 people on board and 19 people on the ground. The crash was the deadliest aviation accident in India since 1996.

The investigation, conducted by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), has been the subject of significant legal and institutional controversy. The Federation of Indian Pilots (FIP) sent a legal notice to the AAIB after investigators summoned a pilot connected to the late Captain Sumeet Sabharwal for questioning. We had previously reported that new analysis by the Safety Matters Foundation of India suggested the Ram Air Turbine (RAT) deployed approximately 2.5 seconds before the fuel switches moved to CUTOFF — a finding that points toward a systemic electrical failure rather than deliberate pilot action.

In February 2026, a separate and unsettling parallel event occurred: Airline Ratings reported that a different Air India Boeing 787-8 (registration VT-ANX) experienced its left engine fuel switch moving spontaneously from RUN to CUTOFF twice on the ground before a scheduled departure from London Heathrow (LHR) to Bangalore.

The aircraft was immediately grounded and the incident reignited debate about fleet-wide fuel switch integrity. These overlapping safety concerns — a catastrophic crash, an unexplained fuel switch event, a cargo container ingestion, and now a storm-damage incident involving three narrowbodies — constitute a significant accumulation of safety-related events for a single carrier within a compressed timeframe.

Photo: Damien Aiello | Wikimedia Commons

What Investigators Will Focus On

The investigation that DIAL has initiated will likely centre on several interconnected questions. First, whether the GSE positioned near the Terminal 2 stands was properly secured in accordance with existing adverse weather protocols. Second, why ATC did not issue a weather advisory in advance of a storm severe enough to physically dislodge heavy ground equipment. Third, whether IndiGo’s equipment contributed to the damage, as DIAL initially stated but IndiGo disputed.

AeroTime noted that this particular aspect — the absence of any ATC weather warning — has not yet been independently confirmed by aviation authorities, and the DGCA has not publicly commented on the meteorological failure. Regulatory investigators will also examine whether current GSE stowage and tie-down standards at DEL are adequate for the intensity of convective weather events that have become increasingly common in north India during the pre-monsoon period.

The broader implication for Indian aviation is one that regulators cannot afford to overlook. Three aircraft removed from service simultaneously at a single airport due to preventable ground-safety failures is not merely an operational inconvenience — it is a systemic safety signal that demands a structural response.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top