Pakistan International Airlines Restores Flight Operations After Engineers’ Strike Grounds International Routes

The national carrier of Pakistan, Pakistan International Airlines (PK), has restored operations after it experienced significant operational turmoil following the refusal of its aircraft engineers to issue air-worthiness certifications, resulting in grounded aircraft and widespread delays across major hubs including Karachi-Jinnah (KHI) and Islamabad International Airport (ISB). 

Nepal’s Biggest Plane Crash: Pakistan International Airlines Flight 268

The engineers, represented by the Society of Aircraft Engineers of Pakistan (SAEP), assert they are compelled to act because they believe certain aircraft operated by the airline are not fit to fly. PIA management, on the other hand, characterized the engineers’ refusal as an illegal stoppage (calling SAEP a “derecognized entity”) orchestrated to obstruct the ongoing privatization process.

Category Details
ICAO Code PIA
Callsign Pakistan
Founded 1946 (as Orient Airways); merged and rebranded as PIA in 1955
Headquarters Karachi, Pakistan
Main Hubs Jinnah International Airport (KHI), Karachi; Allama Iqbal International Airport (LHE), Lahore; Islamabad International Airport (ISB), Islamabad
Secondary Hubs Peshawar (PEW), Quetta (UET), Multan (MUX)
Fleet Size (as of 2025) 32 active aircraft
Fleet Composition ATR 42 / 72, Airbus A320, Boeing 777
Average Fleet Age 18 years
Destinations Around 45 domestic and international destinations across Asia, the Middle East, and Europe
Ownership Government of Pakistan (majority-owned)
Frequent Flyer Program PIA Awards+Plus
Photo: PIA – X

Pakistan International Airlines Flight Schedule Hit

Dozens of flights have been delayed or cancelled as engineers withheld clearances for aircraft they deemed unairworthy. At least 55 flights were reported affected at Monday night’s peak, including 12 international services (and according to The News International, “a large number of them are Umrah pilgrims“) and a number of domestic connections.

PIA operates a mixed fleet of regional carriers such as the ATR 47/72 [ATR 72 is the type that is operated in Pakistan’s neighboring country Nepal, which has similar aviation related problems. An ATR 72 in Nepal crashed in 2022 while it was on its way to Pokhara Airport, an aerodome that is considered to be a failure and has Chinese meddling], Boeing 777s and Airbus A320.

Mingbo Airport: The Forgotten Most Dangerous Airport In The World

Here are the details of PIA’s fleet:

Aircraft Type In Service Parked Total (Current) Future Orders Avg. Age
ATR 42 / 72 2 1 3 9 19.0 years
Airbus A320 10 7 17 2 16.5 years
Boeing 777 5 7 12 19.8 years
Total 17 15 32 11 18 years (avg)
Photo: Ahmed Basit (Pakistan) | Wikimedia Commons

Here is a table showcasing the delays experienced by the flight operated by PIA:

Flight No. Origin Airport Destination Airport Delay Duration
PK747 Allama Iqbal International Airport (LHE), Lahore Prince Mohammad bin Abdulaziz International Airport (MED), Madina 14 hours
PK761 Jinnah International Airport (KHI), Karachi King Abdulaziz International Airport (JED), Jeddah 12 hours
PK300 Jinnah International Airport (KHI), Karachi Islamabad International Airport (ISB), Islamabad 4 hours
PK741 Islamabad International Airport (ISB), Islamabad Prince Mohammad bin Abdulaziz International Airport (MED), Madina 6 hours
PK233 Islamabad International Airport (ISB), Islamabad Dubai International Airport (DXB), Dubai 9 hours
PK245 Islamabad International Airport (ISB), Islamabad King Fahd International Airport (DMM), Dammam 7 hours
PK755 Sialkot International Airport (SKT), Sialkot King Khalid International Airport (RUH), Riyadh 7 hours
Some of the cancelled flights included:
  • One Lahore-Karachi flight
  • Karachi-Skardu flights
  • Lahore-Muscat flights PK-329 and PK-330

Dozens of flights have been delayed or cancelled as engineers withheld clearances for aircraft they deemed unairworthy. The airline resorted to alternative engineering teams, which managed to clear only two aircraft, highlighting the depth of the operational disruption.

Photo: RHL Images | Wikimedia Commons

A Standoff Between Pakistan International Airlines and Aircraft Engineers Association of Pakistan

The PIA management claims that the SAEP has no legal standing. It is said that the Pakistani media has referred to the halt of operations as “Chakka Jaam” [a phrase that can be loosely translated as a closing f operations due to protests, though its literal translation is “jammed tyres”].

PIA management has claimed that SAEP is “using safety as an excuse to collectively stop work is a planned attempt to derail PIA’s privatization” and claimed in a post in X that it had “tried to halt the operations during late hours of last night with their nefarious design to sabotage the privatization process“:

“Management team alongwith key post holders of Engineering Dept. immediately responded. By using alternative means and working tirelessly overnight and the day, restored the ops, thus mitigating the impact of already delayed flights for subsequent operations.”

However, the e-paper Dawn reported that engineers from Pakistan had been silently protesting the issue by wearing black ribbons on their arms, as a show of protest. On November3, however, “they refused to give clearance to aircraft that were causing delays“. SAEP is an association of 570 aircraft engineers associated with the Pakistani flag carrier. SAEP president Abdullah Jadoon told the same source that the organization “vowed to continue it until their demands were fulfilled”:

Earlier today, a senior SAEP member had denied that the society was staging a strike. They insisted that the engineers were only adhering to mandatory safety and certification protocols as per their responsibilities. “Unfortunately, instead of addressing long-pending professional and financial concerns, the PIA management has chosen to label lawful compliance as disruption, which is misleading,” the SAEP member said.

In turn, PIA’s CEO asserted that the Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act, 1952 applies at the Pakistan International Airlines, too making strikes illegal.  and warned that those responsible will face legal consequences, reported Business Recorder:

“The SEAP has no legal standing. Using safety as an excuse to collectively stop work is a planned attempt to derail PIA’s privatisation,” the spokesperson said, adding that the airline’s operations fall under the Essential Services Act, making such strikes or walkouts a punishable offence.”

Even the United States has a parallel to Pakistan Essential Services Act which is why the Air Traffic Controllers in the United States, despite receiving a paycheck of $0 are still working, though this is grave concern. US Airlines are providing free meals to the ATCs in return.

Delta, United, and JetBlue Offer Free Meals to Air Traffic Controllers Working Without Pay

Photo: Faisal Akram | Wikimedia Commons

What is the way out for Pakistan International Airlines?

PIA has set its sights on getting privatized. This would mark this country, which is said that is unlike others, is not a nation which has an army but an army without a nation, see its first privatization, with “divestment of loss-making state firms a central plank of last year’s bailout”.

The companies that have participated in the privatisation process of PIA are:

  • Arif Habib Limited
  • Fauji Fertiliser Company (FFC)
  • Air Blue
  • Lucky Group

To draw a parallel with the nation we’ve previously touched upon, it has also been suggested to Nepal Airlines Corporation to get privatized to solve its financial problems.

Nepal Airlines Corporation History: First Hijacking in Nepal

PIA spokesperson have commented that it would be taking legal against all individuals involved in or supporting SAEP’s actions (which it deems to be illegal) would be “dealt with according to the law”.

Photo: Aeroprints.com | Wikimedia Commons

Comparison of PIA’s current problems with previous disruptions at PIA and elsewhere

Incident Date Nature of disruption Relevance to current event
Engineers’ stoppage at PIA (current) Nov 2025 Engineers refused to issue aircraft clearances, causing multiple delays and cancellations of key international flights. This is the subject of the current article
Maintenance-crew strike and total suspension at PIA Feb 2016
  • All domestic and international PIA flights cancelled as employees struck in protest of privatisation
  • invocation of the Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act, 1952.
  • Highlights that workforce unrest has previously caused full operational shutdowns
  • reported losses of Rs100 million per day.
Crash due to maintenance lapses – PIA Flight PK661 Dec 2016 A twin-turboprop ATR 42-500 of PIA crashed into mountainous terrain; investigation found latent maintenance faults (fractured turbine blade, broken pin) that should have been addressed. Demonstrates the regulatory and engineering dimension of maintenance clearance and the consequences of oversight failure — relates to engineers’ refusal to issue clearances for safety.
Prolonged aircraft groundings and maintenance delays at PIA 2024 (audit report) PIA incurred losses of over Rs 21 billion due to aircraft grounded for maintenance delays (44-239 days) because of administrative and engineering inefficiencies.
  • Highlights structural and recurrent maintenance problems that underpin the current event’s context of engineering staff asserting safety and clearance concerns.
  • According to AeroTime, “PIA’s engine shop that serves the PW127 exhibited anomalies upon the visit of the manufacturer, which were not documented by the local civilian authority during its four-year audit.
Pilot licences and regulatory ban (EASA) on PIA June 2020 and onwards European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) suspended PIA’s authorisation to operate in the EU over concerns about Pakistan’s oversight and pilot licences; later lifted in 2024. Illustrates PIA’s broader regulatory credibility issues and how maintenance and clearance disputes can trigger or reflect deeper systemic problems — the current disruption ties into this pattern of safety and oversight risk.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top