<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Concorde Archives - aviospace.org</title>
	<atom:link href="https://aviospace.org/tag/concorde/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://aviospace.org/tag/concorde/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 13:31:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Concorde’s Longest Flights: Routes, Records, and the Limits of Supersonic Travel</title>
		<link>https://aviospace.org/concorde-longest-flights/</link>
					<comments>https://aviospace.org/concorde-longest-flights/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karan Bhatta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 09:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviospace.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviospace.org news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Airways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concorde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latest aviation news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supersonic flight]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://aviospace.org/?p=12236</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Concorde, the second supersonic airliner, established aviation benchmarks such as the speed of Mach 2.34 that remain unmatched for a commercial aircraft decades after its retirement. The debate over the longest Concorde flight encompasses two distinct milestones: the farthest regular commercial routing the aircraft ever completed and a unique scientific mission in 1973 that [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://aviospace.org/concorde-longest-flights/">Concorde’s Longest Flights: Routes, Records, and the Limits of Supersonic Travel</a> appeared first on <a href="https://aviospace.org">aviospace.org</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://aviospace.org/concorde-longest-flights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why did Concorde Stop Flying? Top 5 Reasons Why it Failed</title>
		<link>https://aviospace.org/why-did-concorde-stop-flying-top-5-reasons-why-it-failed/</link>
					<comments>https://aviospace.org/why-did-concorde-stop-flying-top-5-reasons-why-it-failed/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karan Bhatta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 16:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerospace manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerospace technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviospace.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Airways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concorde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supersonic airline Concorde]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://aviospace.org/?p=9675</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Concorde was an aircraft that had come after fourteen years of collaboration between France and Britain. It was sleek, agile, and had cruised at greater than Mach 2, allowing it to cross the pond in less than two hours. This aircraft saw passenger operations as far back as 1976, prompting to ask if one could [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://aviospace.org/why-did-concorde-stop-flying-top-5-reasons-why-it-failed/">Why did Concorde Stop Flying? Top 5 Reasons Why it Failed</a> appeared first on <a href="https://aviospace.org">aviospace.org</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://aviospace.org/why-did-concorde-stop-flying-top-5-reasons-why-it-failed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Concorde’s Top Speed: A look at the safest supersonic airliner’s pace</title>
		<link>https://aviospace.org/concordes-top-speed-supersonic-airliners/</link>
					<comments>https://aviospace.org/concordes-top-speed-supersonic-airliners/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karan Bhatta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2025 10:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerospace manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerospace technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviospace.org news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Airways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concorde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supersonic airline Concorde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supersonic flight]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://aviospace.org/?p=9622</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>When the former Air France chairman, Jean-Cyril Spinetta, said, “Concorde will never really stop flying because she will live on in people’s imagination”, it encapsulated everyone’s feelings. Apart from hardcore environmentalists who have maintained that an aviation world full of Concordes would simply ruin the planet (for the aircraft was a gas guzzler)[zero carbon flight [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://aviospace.org/concordes-top-speed-supersonic-airliners/">Concorde’s Top Speed: A look at the safest supersonic airliner’s pace</a> appeared first on <a href="https://aviospace.org">aviospace.org</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://aviospace.org/concordes-top-speed-supersonic-airliners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Concorde Flew at 1,350 MPH. Why Haven’t Passenger Planes Gotten Faster?</title>
		<link>https://aviospace.org/why-planes-dont-fly-faster/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karan Bhatta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 11:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerospace manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerospace technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviospace.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviospace.org news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concorde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European aviation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://aviospace.org/?p=8611</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A layperson&#8217;s understanding is that increasing the speed of commercial aircraft would be a boon for the aviation community. A report from BBC showed that planes have become slower in the past 50 years. A flight in 1967 from New York to Los Angeles which took 5 hours and 43 minutes, currently is 40 minutes [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://aviospace.org/why-planes-dont-fly-faster/">The Concorde Flew at 1,350 MPH. Why Haven’t Passenger Planes Gotten Faster?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://aviospace.org">aviospace.org</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Concorde Was Faster Than Sound. But at What Environmental Cost?</title>
		<link>https://aviospace.org/concorde-faster-than-sound-environmental-cost/</link>
					<comments>https://aviospace.org/concorde-faster-than-sound-environmental-cost/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karan Bhatta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2024 06:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concorde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment Sustainability]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://aviospace.org/?p=4588</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The iconic supersonic jet, Concorde, (which probably had an even more iconic flight number: BA001) concluded its 27-year service with a final landing at Filton runway in November 2003. An absence of commercial viability, public concerns about the plane’s noise ( the sonic boom ) alongside high levels of pollution, led to its demise.  Concorde, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://aviospace.org/concorde-faster-than-sound-environmental-cost/">Concorde Was Faster Than Sound. But at What Environmental Cost?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://aviospace.org">aviospace.org</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://aviospace.org/concorde-faster-than-sound-environmental-cost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>From 10 km/h to Mach 2.15: How Commercial Aircraft Speeds Have Changed</title>
		<link>https://aviospace.org/commercial-aircraft-speed-evolution/</link>
					<comments>https://aviospace.org/commercial-aircraft-speed-evolution/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karan Bhatta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 11:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boom Supersonic Aircraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concorde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supersonic and Hypersonic Flight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supersonic flight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tupolev Tu 144]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://aviospace.org/?p=3922</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>It has been just over a century since passengers have been able to fly commercially. During this time, we have seen giants such as the Airbus A380, which has the capacity to transport more than 850 passengers and set a record for being the biggest commercial aircraft ever. Aircraft like the A380 necessitate a different [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://aviospace.org/commercial-aircraft-speed-evolution/">From 10 km/h to Mach 2.15: How Commercial Aircraft Speeds Have Changed</a> appeared first on <a href="https://aviospace.org">aviospace.org</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://aviospace.org/commercial-aircraft-speed-evolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Concorde Flew at Mach 2.04. Are Supersonic Airliners Finally Coming Back?</title>
		<link>https://aviospace.org/concorde-mach-2-supersonic-airliners-comeback/</link>
					<comments>https://aviospace.org/concorde-mach-2-supersonic-airliners-comeback/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karan Bhatta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 02:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerospace manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boom Supersonic Aircraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concorde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russian aircraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet aircraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tupolev Tu 144]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://aviospace.org/?p=1750</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Concorde was one aircraft whose sleek, luxury, and speed have not yet found a worthy replacement. Aviation lovers are nostalgic about the times it just glided through the skies at twice the speed of sound. Much like many beauties, it had its rival- the Tupolev Tu-144, which debuted two months before the Concorde and was [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://aviospace.org/concorde-mach-2-supersonic-airliners-comeback/">Concorde Flew at Mach 2.04. Are Supersonic Airliners Finally Coming Back?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://aviospace.org">aviospace.org</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://aviospace.org/concorde-mach-2-supersonic-airliners-comeback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
