Lukla: 5 Fast Facts About The World’s Most Dangerous Airport

The word “Lukla” in the Sherpa language refers to an “abode of sheep”. Locals say that in the past, the region was rife with this creature, though one would find it next to impossible to locate it these days in the “most-dangerous airport” region. Before the construction of Lula’s iconic airport (LUA), which has been referred to as “bonkers”, trekking to the airport took quite a substantial time- trekkers believe that the airport’s construction has cut down on the time it took to trek to the Everest base Camp by as much as seven days. 

Lukla Airport - Myths vs Facts : aviospace.org
The supposedly most dangerous Airport – Lukla-‘s Runway 24.
Photo: Karan Bhatta | aviospace.org

This extraordinary airport is sometimes referred to as Lukla STOLport (an acronym for Short Take off and Landing Airport), Lukla ALTIport (which is defined as “a small airport in a mountainous area with a steep gradient runway, used for landing up the slope and for take-off down the slope, thereby making use of only one approach/departure area.”), or in the official language of the Civil Aviation Authorty of Nepal, simply as Lukla Aerodrome.

Regardless of the terminologies used to describe this most precariously positioned airport, it, like the Everest region itself, has been a “magnet for kooks, publicity seekers, hopeless romantics”, to borrow the phrase of John Krauker. Let’s take a look at five fast facts about the world’s most dangerous airport in the world- Lukla.

5. It isn’t the most dangerous airport in Nepal, let alone the world

Nepali Pilots and ATC don’t agree on this notion

The students and practitioners of aviation in Nepal don’t believe that Lukla Airport is the most dangerous airport in Nepal. Captain Rabindra Dangol, who has been an instructor pilot for two decades in Nepal (and one who also trains pilots to fly to Lukla Airport) doesn’t quite buy the hype around Lukla’s supposed most-dangerousness:

One has to draw a distinction between technical aspects and practical aspects of operating in a particular airport. Technically, one might reason that Lukla Airport is extremely dangerous becasue after the aircraft has inched past a certain point (while approaching Lukla), there’s no possibility of a go-around. But in terms of practicality, I have found operating to/from Phaplu airport more challenging than LUA”.

Lukla Airport: Myths vs Facts of “the most dangerous airport” - aviospace.org
A DHC-6 Twin Otter operated by Tara Air amidst a backdrop of hills surrounding the Lukla STOLport.
Photo: Karan Bhatta | aviospace.org

The inability of performing a go-around was described by the author of the book titled “Sherpa” as “even when there is a strong wind, no visibility or any other obstacles on the runway, once an airplane crosses the ‘No Go’ zone, it’s only ‘Go Go’, with no chance of turning back”. However, there have been instances when pilots have performed a go-around in Lukla, and one has even been captured in a video. 

Ujjwal Tiwari, an Air Traffic Controller, who has served in Lukla for two years and was also an ATC in other airports in the Himalayas of Nepal, said that in the various talks he has had with numerous pilots who have flown to Lukla, no one has confided LUA as dangerous as it is perceived. He said, “never have I ever found Lukla as being the most challenging or dangerous airport for landing”. He further believed that airports, such as the one in:

  • Rara (Talcha Airport)
  • Dolpa (Juphal Airport)

 are more challenging because the crosswind in these two airfields might necessitate a go-around at any time during approach.

Snowy leaden Talcha Airport in Rara
Photo: Tannu 01|Wikimedia Commons

One of the reasons why Lukla gets branded as “the most-dangerous” might simply be because a moniker such as that might mean more publicity for the Everest Region. More publicity might equate greater flow of tourists and greater revenue in the region. You can read about this matter in detail in our guide below:

4. Other airports in the Everest region are more dangerous

Mingbo being the most glaring example

Phaplu Airport, an airport in the Everest region that Captain Rabindra found more challenging than Lukla, lies at an altitude of 2,413 meter – around 500 meters lower than Lukla. When the wife of Sir Edmund Hillary (the man who was seminal in the construction of Lukla Airport) was headed to Phaplu Airport on a Pilatus PC-6 when the aircraft crashed and killed all occupants on theboard. 

Mingbo airport - more dangerous than Lukla- aviospace.org
The Mingbo Airstrip, which now serves as a place where people camp during treks/expeditions to Everest
Photo: Ivan G. Somlai

Before the construction of Lukla Airport, or Phaplu Airport for that matter, Sir Edmund Hillary had constructed an airport that was far more dangerous than Lukla- the Mingbo Airport. The airport was located at an altitude of  4,650 meters. A Pilatus Porter used to operate in and out of the airport- and possibly before the government of Nepal even knew about it.

The Everest region is also home to Syangboche aerodrome (3,780 meters), an airport that is located near Khumjung village. The airport can turn into a frozen desert in the winter. The greater unpredictability of the weather and a stronger wind in Syangboche would also mean that it would be more dangerous than Lukla. 

Lukla Airport: Myths vs Facts of “the most dangerous airport”- aviospace.org
Syangboche Airport, which currently sees no fixed-wing operations, during snowy conditions.
Photo: Karan Bhatta | aviospace.org
Airports in the district where Lukla lies Runway Starting year
Syangboche Airport 405 m Not Given, though the Civil Aviation Authority of Nepal (CAAN) claims that it had seasonal servicability
Phaplu Airport 680 m  1976
Kangeldanda Airport  520 m  2003
Photo: Filip Janowski

3. The helicopter landed on the top of Mount Everest tookoff from Lukla 

Piloted by an Airbus helicopter test pilot

In 2005, an Airbus A350B3 helicopter was able to land at the top of Everest. The chopper was piloted by helicopter pilot Didier Delsalle, and in doing so, he achieved the lightest landing performed by a helicopter, ever. Curiously, no person before or after Delsalle has been able to climb to the top of Everest.

Lukla Airport: Myths vs Facts of “the most dangerous airport”- aviospace.org
Photo: A350 B3, the helicopter type that landed at the top of Mount Everest
Photo: Vyacheslav Argenberg | Wikimedia Commons

When the Airbus A350B3 was being made, Didier Delsalle proposed that he would try to land at the top of Everest. But Airbus was reticent with the flight, as a crash would have put an indelible stain on the chopper’s prospects. Nonetheless, after years of trying, the aerospace manufacturer acquiesced, and Dider Delsalle landed what was dubbed during its flight as “a mystery chopper” to the summit of Mount Everest. According to the video of this historic flight captured by Airbus, the flight originated in and subsequently landed at Lukla Airport itself. 

Specifications of the helicopter that landed at the top of Everest

Service Ceiling 23000 ft
Rate of Climb  1959 fpm
Takeoff Power 632 kW
Max T/O Weight 6173 Lb

2. Lukla is one of the cheapest aerodrome to be constructed

The second-cheapest airport in the Everest region

When Sir Edmund Hillary built the Mingbo airstrip, it cost him merely $900. This prompted him to claim that the Mingbo Airstrip might have been one of the cheapest airstrips to have been ever constructed. Much of the $900 was down to the labor fees paid to the Sherpa locals, who helped level the field by maneuvering the large boulders in Mingbo into pits they had dug specifically to bury the large rocks.

Lukla Airport: Myths vs Facts of “the most dangerous airport”- aviospace.org
In the days of the yore, cattle used to graze in Lukla’s runway. When an aircraft approached, a siren would go off, and people would clear the runway.
Photo: BBLBobby | Wikimedia Commons

In comparison, acquiring the land needed for the Lukla Airport, cost Hillary merely $600. Although he did say that it was “a substantial sum in that area in those days”, one can reminisce upon this figure, the sort of fame the airport has been able to garner, and feel that the airport was acquired at a bargain. [Take Mumbai’s Navi airport, in contrast. The airport necessitated almost $2 billion construction cost]

Runway of Lukla Airport
Photo: Nirojsedhai|Wikimedia Commons

Let’s take a look at how the costs of Lukla Airport compare with some costs associated with other airport projects in Nepal.

Name of the airport project Associated costs
Pokhara Airport Construction cost $216 million
Lukla Helipad construction (in 2019) $2.2 million
Nijgadh Airport (proposed) Expected costs of construction are around $3.45 billion

 

Photo: Government of Nepal, Aircraft Accident Investigation Commission

5. Lukla’s accident history isn’t as frightening as it has been perceived

When Lukla Airport’s most-dangerousness is often discussed, people who’ve not been here feel that the airport must have an accident history that is rife with hull losses and hundreds of lives lost. But that is not quite the case. According to the data in the Aviation Safety Network, there have been seven incidents of aircraft accidents with destination Lukla Airport, and three of aircraft that departed Lukla. In all of these accidents, fifty-six people have lost their lives. This number is smaller than the number of people who departed in the crash of Yeti Airlines Flight 691

https://aviospace.org/lukla-airport-separating-myths-from-facts-about-the-most-dangerous-airport/ - aviospace.org
The incident involving a crash of a Let L-410 Turbolet operated by Summit Airline and an AS350B3E in Lukla
Photo: Government of Nepal
Aircraft Accident Investigation Commission, 2019
  • In 2008, Yeti Airlines’ DHC-6-300 Twin Otter, registered 9N-AFE, crashed at Lukla. Investigators identified failures by both the regulator and the airline’s safety management system to address unsafe pilot practices, particularly those associated with STOL operations.
  • A separate Goma Airlines accident was linked partly to an ATS officer’s failure to close the airport as deteriorating weather made operations unsafe.
  • In 2019, Summit Air’s Let L-410UPV-E20, registered 9N-AMH, crashed during an attempted takeoff and collided with two helicopters operated by Manang Air and Shree Airlines.
Scroll to Top